Hey you, you didn't build that, Obama did!

[Eric@PTP]

Originally Posted by AK Gandy

How come you and Seaweed are so obsessed with butt-plug's?

Is it a prerequisite to work there....... or is it a taste developed once you're hired?


.

Your an idiot LMAO, this is the one and only Seabee jackwad. Whats your obsession with being up BO's rear ? That's the better question IMO.

[AK Gandy]

Originally Posted by Eric@PTP

....... this is the one and only Seabee jackwad.

I shoulda guessed.

Even Nate would know better than to hire two dumbazzes........ who are obsessed with butt-plug's.


"Seabee jackwad."

Yeah....that definitely fits.

.

[Rustin]

The as usual PSN fashion. When the thread gets dry just mention "butt-plug!"

[Binderpower]

Originally Posted by MOTO7.3

aamartin89. This thread would not exist if our country was not headed to the brink and the point of NO return if we do not get obama out and the senate so that we can reverse the crap that The left has pushed down our throats. Being 16 trillion in debt is as serious as it come soon the dollar will be worth penny's then we are screwed (every one). So i will say this a vote for obama is a vote against the U.S. Constitution. The blue print to the greatest country the world has ever seen.

This election is not right vs left it is Capitalism vs Marxism/Socialism

Absolutely without a doubt.

[Eric@PTP]

Originally Posted by AK Gandy

I shoulda guessed.

Even Nate would know better than to hire two dumbazzes........ who are obsessed with butt-plug's.


"Seabee jackwad."

Yeah....that definitely fits.

.

Yeah the guy who didn't vote for Owebama is the Jackass..... Right...

[Rustin]

I don't think it's going to be, what you all think it's going to be.

[ducatirider944]

Originally Posted by Pocket

Blanket statement. Explain how he can possibly do this with the other 2/3rds of the government as a check and balance system. Not to mention our military would never go against the constitution like that against its own citizens.

So no no no no..... it's totally plausable, right? I mean, let's just make a hyped claim without backing it up with any research into how our government actually works, and let's try to pawn it off as fact.

It's fun to see how extremists feel they are entitled to make false claims, while at the same time they feel it's unnecessary to back them up with any facts or proof whatsoever.


About as many as there has always been.... which is not many. An extremely small minority.


So you blindly believe everything Michael Savage and Alex Jones say, and you believe it without question. Yet you refuse to believe anything and constantly question anything someone else says who in your mind might lean only slightly more left than you, and you call them sheeple to make yourself feel better about those who you choose to blindly follow. Yeah, that makes sense..... not!


Thank you for proving my last point.


Again, thank you for proving my last point.


And yet again, thank you for proving my last point.


Wow, you will believe ANYTHING that someone tells you, as long as it appeals to your sense of right-wing extremism.


Sure you can. Stop sucking and simply bite down.


Sorry to disappoint, but I've never once been on welfare.


So what is life like living in constant fear of conspiracy theories?

To this whole post, Ever hear of a guy named Hitler? or how about the Nazi's? It happened once, what makes you so positive it won't happen again? To think it can't, history proves you wrong.

[Joker4life]

Originally Posted by Pocket

And there are still so many guys who are intentionally ignoring the fact that Obama's statements were taken out of context, re-arranged, and falsified in order to change the meaning.

How long is everyone going to ignore this?

I don't like Obama just as much as the next person, but making up crap about him only makes the people who believe it look like retards.

Because dip#### said it was taken out of context, you take that as fact.The PUNK exposed his stupidity,get used to it.It will happen a lot more the closer we get to the election.

[444-4D]

By Lawrence Kudlow July 21, 2012 6:47 am

Does anybody remember, back in the depths of the recession of 1981-82, how President Ronald Reagan kept his chin up and exhorted American businesses to work hard and produce an economic recovery?

Reagan had a program of tax cuts, limited domestic spending, deregulation and a strong defense aimed at overturning Soviet communism. He argued in speech after speech that his domestic plan would produce higher economic growth and lower unemployment, and that prosperity would generate the resources to fund a strong national security.

Cynics proliferated. But Reagan stayed with it, praising free enterprise and entrepreneurs. And eventually, sunny skies replaced gloomy clouds. "Morning in America" appeared in 1983-84.

But here's the key point: When Reagan praised our capitalist system and the businesses inside it, he provided a psychological lift to accompany his fiscal program. That was leadership.

Now contrast President Reagan's performance with President Obama's recent attack on business. Instead of exhorting entrepreneurship, Obama demonized it. Here's the money quote: "If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."

That's a put down to business recovery, not an exhortation. Reagan praised entrepreneurs into recovery. Why must Obama trash them into recession?

Great innovators like Thomas Alva Edison, Henry Ford and Andrew Carnegie didn't rely on government. There was hardly any of it in those days. More recently, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Larry Ellison used genius to put brand-new ideas into production.

And then you've got a whole smaller class of entrepreneurs: the electricians, bakers, clothing designers and financial planners. They don't depend on government. It's always been a question of the American genius of entrepreneurship that makes the country run. And that's optimism. It's not name-calling or negativism. But it is the reliance on government under Obama that has undermined the morale of our economy.

In an interview this week with Tim Geithner, the treasury secretary said the problem with the economy is insufficient government spending. But I would argue that government spending is the problem.

A week earlier, I interviewed Alan Greenspan. I asked him about the impact of over $1 trillion in federal spending. He answered, "Well, actually, strangely as it may seem, the data are showing that it's negative." Greenspan said businesses -- especially smaller businesses -- are essentially on a capital strike. They see large-scale deficits and debt and assume that prohibitive tax rates cannot be far behind.

Greenspan also said the U.S. government has borrowed so much money it has drained scarce capital from the private sector. Nobody wants to build long-term assets, like factories, buildings and houses.

Obama does not understand that his government-centered model is doing vastly more harm than good. That's why, three and a half years in, he's got slumping numbers on jobs, retail sales, manufacturing and home sales, and a gross domestic product rate that could be 1 percent or less. We may be on the front end of another recession without even going through a real recovery.

And the center of economic gravity has shifted in the wrong direction. Food stamps are soaring. Social Security disability benefits are rising faster than jobs. And roughly half of U.S. households are receiving federal-transfer-payment assistance. This is a European-style model, not an American one.

Then you have some of the dumbest fiscal ideas ever, like the new one from Sen. Patty Murray. She wants all the Bush tax cuts to expire on Dec. 31, 2012 -- an event that will surely lead to recession -- and then have Congress magically vote for middle-class tax cuts in 2013. This is incredibly foolish (and improbable).

But like Obama, Murray has it out for successful earners, investors and small-business owners. In order to tax them, she is more than willing to risk recession.

Raising the tax on the upper-two income brackets would slam the 3.5 percent of small-business owners who generate 53 percent of the small-business income, according to the Joint Tax Committee. And that's where the jobs are.

Ernst & Young estimates a job loss of 710,000 if those upper tax brackets are raised. And when you combine all that with scheduled new taxes from Obamacare, you're looking at substantially higher tax rates than anything Bill Clinton ever had. And of course, Clinton cut the capital gains tax. But today's Democrats want to raise it (along with taxes on dividends and estates).

This whole assault on success by left-wing politicians is a staggering reversal from the spirit of Ronald Reagan. You can even go back to FDR: His big-government, tax-the-rich policies failed, but at least he preached that happy days were coming again.

Most Democrats today don't understand or recall the history of American economic success. That's why this country desperately needs change in the White House and the Senate if we're to stop this American economic decline.

[Rustin]

True but long statement.

It makes me feel that Obama's administration is part of a plan to kill the dollar.

I don't think Mit will ever come close to Dutch's style of politics.